Friday, May 06, 2016
Notes on an overheard conversation at a local BBQ restaurant that plays both types of music—country AND western
“Oh no!”
“What?”
“Now I'm earwormed!”
“With what?”
“Save a horse, ride a cowboy.”
“Wasn't that the plot to ‘Brokeback Mountain?’”
Tuesday, May 10, 2016
This isn't at all about replacing waitrons. Not at all. Nope. Nothing to do with the bottom line or a naked grab at more money. Nope. It's all for the customers' convenience.
One of the things my dad comments on these days is the preponderance of restaurant patrons peering into their smart phones or tablets, ignoring everyone else, which is okay, because everyone else at the table is peering into their smart phones or tablets. Even though they're eating together, they are still eating alone.
One of the things that still gets me is the preponderance of televisions in restaurants. I find them terribly distracting and very hard not to watch. I can somewhat understand a sports bar having them to show sporting games, but McDonalds?. The worse offender I've found is The Flashback Diner which has a television per booth!
Insane!
So what do Bunny and I find tonight at Olive Garden?
![[It's the bastard child of a television with the downside of excessive advertising plus a tablet with the downside of pay-to-play click-games with the hassle of a restaurant trying to run an IT department. That it has not ended well, much less ended, is beyond me.]](/2016/05/10/ziosk.jpg "It's the bastard child of a television with the downside of excessive advertising plus a tablet with the downside of pay-to-play click-games with the hassle of a restaurant trying to run an IT department. That it has not ended well, much less ended, is beyond me.")
A Ziosk on every table.
Apparently they've been around for a few years and so far, Bunny and I have managed to avoid the restaurants that have the darned devices.
In theory, it seems like a Good Thing™. You can place orders for drinks and desserts through the device. And you can signal for the server (I presume some sort of signal is sent to the kitchen or the server lounge or something but all we noticed is a red light flashing on top of the unit when we did this) and pay the check (the previous party at our table still owed 7¢—how I do not know). But the incessant advertising for food, drinks and “pay-for-play” games just got to be too much (even though the unit itself was thankfully quiet).
We ended up turning the device to face away from us.
I don't know. It just bugs me on some level. Do we as a nation have the attention span of a rabid ferret—oooooh! Shiny!
Wednesday, May 11, 2016
Just how many engineers does it take to solve a simple geometry problem?
Two months later and we're still waiting to install updates to “Project: Sippy-Cup”
into production.
We were finally given the “okay” this week,
but have twice scrubbed the launch deployment because … “reasons.”
Sigh.
So there's very little for us (the Call Processing team at the Ft. Lauderdale Office of The Corporation) to do this week. And because of that, I've started back to work on a small geometry problem that floated around the office some time last year—find “x”:
![[Note: it's not to scale. And no, circling the “x” and scribbling “Found it!” is not the answer.]](/2016/05/11/geometry-puzzle.png "Note: it's not to scale. And no, circling the “x” and scribbling “Found it!” is not the answer.")
I can't be that hard, right? All you need to solve it is geometry. You know, the interior angles of a triangle sum to 180°, what constitutes congruent triangles, all that stuff you should have learned in the 10th grade but have probably forgotten by now.
Um … yeah.
![[Sure, ∠CEA ≅ ∠CQB, but where does that get us?]](/2016/05/11/geometry.jpg "Sure, ∠CEA ≅ ∠CQB, but where does that get us?")
Fellow cow-orker T didn't solve it (and took a copy home for his son to work on). T2 solved it by using trigonometry. And it took a few hours of hashing it out between myself and R to get a purely geometric solution to it.
