Anyway, by some mysterious process, we've arrived at a recession
level of unemployment that's lower than the expansion level of five
years ago. Pretty neat stuff. Which only leaves us one question:
Where the hell's my job
Via InstaPundit.Com,
Megan
McArdle on unemployment
Rob and I were
talking about unemployment the other day. I had remarked that economists
(or business leaders, or both) had said that there is a minimum amount of
unemployment that is needed to keep the economy working. At the time, we
both theorized that it was the level required to keep those employed in line
(the Cynical/Conspriatorial Theory).
The article above (mediumish length, but worth it) goes into detail about
how this minimum level of unemployment to sustain our economy comes (or
came) about. It's less a conspriacy and more a way companies find the
maximum profit given the rules of the game.
You have my permission to link freely to any entry here. Go
ahead, I won't bite. I promise.
The dates are the permanent links to that day's entries (or
entry, if there is only one entry). The titles are the permanent
links to that entry only. The format for the links are
simple: Start with the base link for this site: https://boston.conman.org/, then add the date you are
interested in, say 2000/08/01,
so that would make the final URL:
https://boston.conman.org/2000/08/01
You can also specify the entire month by leaving off the day
portion. You can even select an arbitrary portion of time.
You may also note subtle shading of the links and that's
intentional: the “closer” the link is (relative to the
page) the “brighter” it appears. It's an experiment in
using color shading to denote the distance a link is from here. If
you don't notice it, don't worry; it's not all that
important.
It is assumed that every brand name, slogan, corporate name,
symbol, design element, et cetera mentioned in these pages is a
protected and/or trademarked entity, the sole property of its
owner(s), and acknowledgement of this status is implied.
