Twenty years ago, writing about antitrust crimes in the Michigan Law
Review, Easterbrook and Fischel, then both professors at the
University of Chicago, wrote that managers not only may, but should,
violate the rules when it is profitable to do so. And it is clear
that they believed that this rule should apply beyond just
In a nutshell, this is the Chicago School view of corporate law that
has taken hold over the past 20 years.
Rotten to the
So, this explains crap like Microsoft and Enron and the RIAA and the
the past twenty years.
That's the bad news.
The good news?
According to the article, there is a rise of law professors from outside the
Chicago School who are questioning this, and saying that corporations
should actually follow the law! The horror!
Obligatory Contact Info
You have my permission to link freely to any entry here. Go
ahead, I won't bite. I promise.
The dates are the permanent links to that day's entries (or
entry, if there is only one entry). The titles are the permanent
links to that entry only. The format for the links are
simple: Start with the base link for this site: https://boston.conman.org/, then add the date you are
interested in, say 2000/08/01,
so that would make the final URL:
You can also specify the entire month by leaving off the day
portion. You can even select an arbitrary portion of time.
You may also note subtle shading of the links and that's
intentional: the “closer” the link is (relative to the
page) the “brighter” it appears. It's an experiment in
using color shading to denote the distance a link is from here. If
you don't notice it, don't worry; it's not all that
It is assumed that every brand name, slogan, corporate name,
symbol, design element, et cetera mentioned in these pages is a
protected and/or trademarked entity, the sole property of its
owner(s), and acknowledgement of this status is implied.